BirdsCaribbean Expresses Deep Concern Over Three Damaging Developments in Grenada

17 comments

  1. Julia Munro says:

    A long time ago I recall the Government saying our forests and wetlands are not for use for building and no one can purchase them. I was so shocked when I saw houses were built in Grand Etang. Now Mt Hartman is destroyed and Levera. These people care nothing about Grenada and Grenadians. They know they can jump a plane and fly away to another man’s country so they are making sure we Grenadians and our children end up with nothing.
    People: it’s time we stand on our feet and fight for our country so our children can have something to look forward to. Look at the pics with the birds how beautiful they look in their habitat. We need to keep Grenada beautiful and not allow anyone to destroy it for us. Let’s make our voices be heard. This is serious business.

  2. James Donahue says:

    This development is so sad really… Grenada government has sold out to foreign money.
    We have been coming to Grenada since before Ivan, a time of the real pure Grenada.
    Now China and Arabs and others come and lay waste to beauty in the name of resorts.
    Look at BBC and how it change in 20 years. It was paradise, now resorts took over.
    Ivan robbed Grenada of much but people rebuilt. China & others are robbing Grenada now but no rebuilding what you have sold.
    We loved Grenada before all this development but that time is gone, all that remains is good memories of family and friends there.

  3. CLAUDIA CATO says:

    It’s a shame, what is happening to my beautiful country Grenada, all because of a greedy and treacherous government, they only think of profits, not the well being of the people and animals that need their protections. I call on every Grenadian, wherever you are, let us stand together as one to protect our “Country” from these people who does not believe in beautiful things of a country.

  4. Tourist from Europe says:

    These developments have to stop right now!!! Are there any laws and regulations in this country???

  5. Angus fisher says:

    Nothing will change NNP DON’T CARE.
    BUT when one or 2 get taken out in public watch dem move out fast.. Remember the Revo

  6. Garvey says:

    Most Caribbean leaders are a bunch of Pimps prostituting the people’s property and their legacy to their deep pockets. They make our leaders into prostitutes and the people suffer. We the people in the region don’t benefit, it’s only the developers and the so-called leaders who sell us out for chump change.

  7. The Grand Poobah says:

    It is not the “Government of Grenada” who is guilty or these “crimes”. It is likely only a very small cadre of key players in and around the top eschelons of said Government. One can readily guess what their motivation is for doing what they are engaged in. Nuff said!

  8. George says:

    I’ve seen so many artist renderings and pretty pictures of what will be and years and years go by and all that’s left is concrete roads through the bush. People are wanting a Grenada passport and one must ask why, especially now that the UK is out of the Euro. Who are these people that will spend hundreds of thousands USD for a passport? What sense does that make in an honest world? An honest world, what a laugh, but we get nice concrete roads through the bush and pretty pictures.

  9. We hear you George. . . just recently watched Diplomats for Sale – Al Jazeera Investigations on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Yba1-ijh4
    Gives you the answer as to why some people want a Grenadian (or Dominican, etc.) passport. The video states: “Citizenship By Investment is a major source of income for Caribbean and European countries. Legal but controversial – wealthy families from Asia, Middle East and Russia invest around a quarter million dollars in luxury resorts or government scheme, in return they get citizenship and a new passport which allows visa-free travel to many countries. Criminals have to pay more (e.g., $1 million). As one commentator says towards the end: “Any regime putting up diplomatic status for sale is morally bankrupt.”

  10. Lloyd says:

    This is distressing. Grenada, like many Caribbean countries, go to international agencies and beg for funds to implement climate change adaptation strategies, yet the national decisions continue to increase the vulnerability of the countries. In addition to the online petition, I suggest the following actions by local and interested regional organizations:
    (1) Move this information online immediately.
    (2) Prepare briefing paper on the impact of the project on the vulnerability and long-term development of the country. That should be shared with the community, policy makers, the external project proponent, and the financing institution.
    (3) Prepare an analysis of how the project would affect Grenada’s commitment to the 2030 agenda, and present that analysis as a policy brief or other appropriate document.
    (4) Find out if the developer intends to have a branded hotel and/or marina, and contact the brand(s) with the concerns.

  11. Janet Barber says:

    Does the Government of Grenada (GoG)realise that it appears incompetent and environmentally irresponsible and will suffer serious consequences from the international donor network, if it allows these developments to go ahead. It will also suffer from an increasingly bad reputation nationally and will lose the trust of citizens. It is apparent that no effective analysis of impacts has been done. If properly and sensitively planned there should have been plenty of opportunity for mitigation planning of social and ecological impacts.
    Many countries are finding that Chinese funding is not the answer to their economic development – since it is entirely self-interested, and the main economic returns will benefit the Chinese – ‘coral-ling the world’s resources’ as someone said recently.
    Has anyone looked at where the investment is coming from for the private capital investment? How much is the GoG committing, and how much and from where private capital.
    First step – achieve a halt to the development – to what extent is it known which Minister(s) are in the driving seat on these developments? Discussion with them?
    Second- get a review of sources of funding, and on what terms and very importantly how is the island going to benefit – precisely
    Third – if it comes to it, get Ministers to agree on looking at each plan separately and good people to advise on a reformed sustainably principled development
    Fourth – who in the press is on your side?

  12. Janet Barber says:

    Furthermore, is the GoG breaking national, regional law in permitting these developments? Do you have environmental lawyers to hand or in the Caribbean who can analyse the degree of law breaking – certainly ‘soft’ law in terms of Multi-lateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) like Ramsar. This kind of transgression – particularly ignoring national legislation, (and lack of consultation with stakeholders) won’t go down well with international donors increasingly concerned with sustainable practices.

Comments are closed.